tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post835216037948029961..comments2024-03-17T22:20:16.771+08:00Comments on 經數樂園-學習變有趣~<a href="http://ronaldchik.com"><i><small>[找補習?]</small></i></a>: 2013 DSE Econ Paper 1 MC 答案連詳細解釋Ronald Chikhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00369938068297303839noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-14420340841073684412022-06-22T18:47:42.003+08:002022-06-22T18:47:42.003+08:00thank youthank youAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-69698800464055831322022-01-10T23:52:44.952+08:002022-01-10T23:52:44.952+08:00謝謝你的問題,你問的是第21條問題,選項C的印度consultant的產值,他是替香港公司工作,產生...謝謝你的問題,你問的是第21條問題,選項C的印度consultant的產值,他是替香港公司工作,產生的服務在香港地方,所以計在香港的GDP呀!<br />但問題是問:是否*不計*在NIA中。他(印度人)外地人在香港賺香港公司的錢,所以是要計在 NIA 呀。Ronald Chikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00369938068297303839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-88792102193115960202022-01-03T15:08:24.803+08:002022-01-03T15:08:24.803+08:00C[indian在HK賺的錢] is included in Net factor income f...C[indian在HK賺的錢] is included in Net factor income from abroad [ans is A], then this means his salary is not included in GDP?<br /><br />since GNP = GDP + net income from abroad<br /> = GDP + factor income from abroad [HK人在海外賺的錢] - factor income <br />But Indian賺的錢的公司is HK 公司,so why is his salary not included in hk gdp?<br />abchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06987255584985999884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-90638780813835621112020-02-04T18:36:11.678+08:002020-02-04T18:36:11.678+08:005** 分數5** 分數Ronald Chikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00369938068297303839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-68260120939383588472020-02-04T16:23:31.464+08:002020-02-04T16:23:31.464+08:00全啱,really easy全啱,really easyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08771488903566922267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-19322960623808340012016-01-04T23:11:26.976+08:002016-01-04T23:11:26.976+08:00Thank You~Thank You~Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-91430784376163068772015-05-01T15:29:14.270+08:002015-05-01T15:29:14.270+08:0016a 係quality 唔係quantity 喎??16a 係quality 唔係quantity 喎??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-18260680445115528462015-04-18T14:11:54.588+08:002015-04-18T14:11:54.588+08:00oh you are talking about supply.. just my error in...oh you are talking about supply.. just my error in translation.. thanks!htam13https://www.blogger.com/profile/07798710028459778067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-65116561508390028812015-04-17T14:46:29.863+08:002015-04-17T14:46:29.863+08:00你講緊第12條,我答:
12(A)X平,買多左X,Y是替代品,所以買少了,需求跌,價跌;X平,賣少...你講緊第12條,我答:<br /><br />12(A)X平,買多左X,Y是替代品,所以買少了,需求跌,價跌;X平,賣少左X,Y是競爭供給(即用相類投入),於是多了投入可生產Y,供應升,價跌。<br /><br />X平,買多左X。。。呢個係需求概念。<br />X平,賣少左X。。。呢個係供應概念。Ronald Chikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00369938068297303839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-17111643222422191082015-04-17T10:37:51.370+08:002015-04-17T10:37:51.370+08:00Why X平,賣少左X? I am a bit confused hereWhy X平,賣少左X? I am a bit confused herehtam13https://www.blogger.com/profile/07798710028459778067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-77532683113723700082013-04-22T14:28:45.697+08:002013-04-22T14:28:45.697+08:00Yes you are right, i have inputed the re-exports a...Yes you are right, i have inputed the re-exports amount as "import of good", have corrected. Thanks for advice.Ronald Chikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00369938068297303839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8244595.post-91336503623968083212013-04-22T13:20:28.315+08:002013-04-22T13:20:28.315+08:00Q22 should be A, total exports of goods = domestic...Q22 should be A, total exports of goods = domestic exports + re exports , so no need to minus 70Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com